With the release of ‘Moneyball’ (my review should come through in the next few days on The Reeltime Report) this coming weekend there
has been a spike in interest in the whole Sabermetric debate. The Sabermetric debate of course, has always been
between the difference of what’s on paper with what’s seen by the “scout’s eye.” Somebody may be hitting for a high average,
but the kinds of pitches they are getting are not what they can plan on seeing
consistently. Adjustments can be made by
all players to counteract success, yet the numbers don’t lie, if somebody is
hitting a high average with a high on-base percentage (OBP), then they’re helping
their team. Around and around we go.
People who aren’t into baseball statistics and find them
confusing and/or annoying (
I’m looking at you Jason Whitlock),
have decided to take this opportunity to talk about why statistics are ruining
baseball.
According to Whitlock
Sabermetric honks have “conspired to remove much of the magic and mystery from
baseball.”
His inherent point is that
the fan loses the “fun” aspect of being a baseball fan if everything can be
explained away in numbers.
His argument
is that he doesn’t need On-base Plus Slugging to tell him that Albert Pujols is
one of the greatest hitters of all time, he doesn’t need WHIP (walks + hits per
inning pitched) or xFIP (expected fielding independent pitching) to tell ham that
Justin Verland can throw the baseball.